Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE J Radio Freq Identif. 2023 May 17;7:118–133. doi: 10.1109/jrfid.2023.3276310

TABLE III.

Representatives of Antennas for RFID Applications

Ref. Antenna Configuration Size (L×W×H) (mm3) Frequency (GHz) Maximum Realized Gain (dBi) Bandwidth (MHz) Fractional Bandwidth (%) Radiation Efficiency (%) Characteristics
[84] Dual-layer, two patches fed via a PIFA array 26×14×2.4 0.923 −1.4 16* 1.7* 23 Electrically small, metal-mountable
[85] A meandered patch fed by a coupled microstrip line 100×50×0.8 0.915 −3.8§ 43 4.7 N.A. Broadband, metal-mountable
[86] Slotted, magnetic dipole-based antenna 180×60×20 0.92 5.3 62 6.7 N.A. Low-profile, vertical polarized
[87] A single longer dipole and a pair of shorter dipoles 43×26×0.5 2.4
5
7.5
9.5
120
2100
5
42
>95 Dual-band, single-substrate
[88] SIR coupled dipole antenna 25×9×1.6 2.4
5–6
2.6
3.6
95
1380
4.0
26.5
88.6
96.87
Dual-band, broadband, electrically small
[89] Hybrid-fed microstrip antenna ~35×35×1.5 3
6
1.17
3.33
50
240
1.7
4.0
40–70 Dual-fed, low-profile
[90] Diamond-shaped patch antenna 150×150×1.66 0.915
2.45
7.8
9.4
18
80
2.0
3.3
87
94
Dual-band, single-substrate
[91] Rectangular slot antenna 2.5×2.5×2.5 24
40
−1 0 ~5000
~8000
19
20
41
31
On chip, dual-band, millimeter-wave
*

represents −3 dB (half-power) bandwidth/fractional bandwidth, while others represent −10 dB bandwidth/fractional bandwidth.

§

represents that the results are obtained from simulations, while others are obtained from measurements.

refers solely to the dimensions of the resonator or radiator and does not encompass the overall dimensions of the antenna.