Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;10:1225826. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1225826

Table 3.

Link between antibiotic use (AMU) measured in nDCDvet/cow/year (numeric data or classified in tertiles) in 2020 and the presence of antibiotic resistance (AMR) to different antibiotic classes among commensal E. coli isolated from 51 farms in 2020.

AMR in 2020 Total AMU in 2020 (nDCDvet/cow/year) Numeric AMU data Classified AMU data
Est. SE z p Est. SE z p
Multi-drug All AB 0.20 0.28 0.71 0.477 0.25 0.71 0.35 0.724
Cephalosporins Cephalosporins 3rd and 4th Gen. 0.98 1.19 0.82 0.411 0.00 1.06 0.00 1.000
Cephalosporins All cephalosporins 1.06 1.15 0.92 0.358 0.00 0.90 0.00 1.000
Cephalosporins All cephalosporins and all penicillins −0.23 0.45 −0.52 0.603 0.00 1.06 0.00 1.000
Penicillins All penicillins 0.06 0.27 0.23 0.818 −0.49 0.70 −0.70 0.487
Penicillin All cephalosporins and all penicillins 0.11 0.25 0.42 0.674 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.000
Quinolones Fluoroquinolones 5.89 4.77 1.24 0.216 2.17 1.15 1.89 0.059
Sulfonamides Sulfonamide and trimethoprim 23.22 15.26 1.52 0.128 1.98 0.77 2.59 0.010
Tetracyclines Tetracyclines 3.58 2.89 1.24 0.216 1.30 0.75 1.73 0.084

Antibiotic classes in AMR represent following tested substances: Penicillin-Ampicillin; Cephalosporins- Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime; Quinolones-Ciprofloxacin, Nalidixic acid; Tetracyclines-Tetracycline, Tigecycline; Sulfonamide-Sulfamethoxazol. For classified AMU data results are shown for the comparison of the two extreme conditions (i.e., low vs. high AMU; low vs. intermediate AMU not shown). Est, estimate; SE, standard error.