Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;192(8):1415–1423. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad090

Table 1.

Comparison of the Total and Controlled Direct Effect of Smoking Cessation on Dementia Diagnosis When Death (a Competing Event for Dementia) Is Present

Feature Total Effect Controlled Direct Effect
Estimands for the risk differencea Inline graphic Inline graphic
Exchangeability assumption needed for death (competing events)?b Not needed Needed. Requires that at each follow-up time, conditional on the measured past, death is independent of future counterfactual outcomes had everyone followed Inline graphic and death was eliminated.
Positivity assumption needed for death (competing events)?b Not needed Needed. Requires that for any possibly observed level of exposure and covariate history among those remaining uncensored (alive) and free of dementia diagnosis through k, some individuals continue to remain alive through k + 1.
Consistency assumption needed for death (competing events)?b Not needed Needed. Requires that an intervention that “eliminates death (competing events)” is well-defined.
Interpretation The effect captures all pathways by which exposure affects dementia, which may include both direct and indirect exposure effects outside and through the exposure’s effect on mortality Direct effect on dementia not via death, referring to scenario where death has (somehow) been eliminated.

a Inline graphic denotes counterfactual dementia diagnosis status by k + 1 under exposure level Inline graphic. Inline graphic denotes counterfactual dementia diagnosis status by k + 1 under exposure level Inline graphic and (somehow) eliminating the competing event such that Inline graphic.

b See Web Appendix 2 for fuller discussion.