. 2023 Jul 7;36(3):222–238. doi: 10.1007/s10905-023-09836-5

Table 4.

Comparisons of three different temperature treatments (18 °C, 21 and 23 °C), for male and female Anthocoris nemoralis

Temperature	Coefficients	Estimate	SE	Z value	P value	Response
18 M ~ 21 M	$D_{a}$	0.0003	0.027	0.013	0.990	Rogers Type II
18 M ~ 21 M	$D_{h}$	0.317	0.487	0.652	0.515	Rogers Type II
18 M ~ 23 M	$D_{a}$	0.020	0.022	0.907	0.365	Rogers Type II
18 M ~ 23 M	$D_{h}$	0.946	0.449	2.11	0.035	Rogers Type II
21 M ~ 23 M	$D_{a}$	0.020	0.021	0.957	0.339	Rogers Type II
21 M ~ 23 M	$D_{h}$	0.631	0.420	1.50	0.133	Rogers Type II
18 F ~ 21 F	$D_{a}$	-0.048	0.031	-1.54	0.124	Rogers Type II
18 F ~ 21 F	$D_{h}$	0.066	0.186	0.353	0.724	Rogers Type II
18 F ~ 23 F	$D_{a}$	-0.028	0.028	-0.987	0.324	Rogers Type II
18 F ~ 23 F	$D_{h}$	0.203	0.185	1.10	0.273	Rogers Type II
21 F ~ 23 F	$D_{a}$	0.020	0.032	0.619	0.536	Rogers Type II
21 F ~ 23 F	$D_{h}$	0.138	0.162	0.847	0.397	Rogers Type II

Using the difference method, with difference in attack rate $(D_{a})$ and difference in handling time $(D_{h})$ , p values in bold show a significant difference