Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;33(4):853–859. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01805-z

Table 1.

Students’ responses to feedback questionnaire

Questions Strongly disagree
n (%)
Disagree
n (%)
Neutral n
(%)
Agree
n (%)
Strongly agree
n (%)
Median
The activity increased comprehension 3 (3.1) 6 (6.3) 20 (21.1) 51 (53.7) 15 (15.8) 4
The activity enabled in-depth coverage of topic 5 (5.3) 12 (12.6) 14 (14.7) 49 (51.6) 15 (15.8) 4
The activity helped in enhancing communication skills 4 (4.2) 1 (1.1) 9 (9.5) 57 (60) 24 (25.3) 4
A thorough discussion on the topic increased analytical ability 2 (2.1) 12 (12.6) 12 (12.6) 51 (53.7) 18 (18.9) 4
The activity helped in overcoming shyness and hesitation in the class 2 (2.1) 6 (6.3) 12 (12.6) 49 (51.6) 26 (27.6) 4
This form of exercise should be incorporated for all the topics in pharmacology 14 (14.7) 21 (22.1) 25 (26.3) 21 (22.1) 14 (14.7) 3
The activity ingrained teaching skills in the participants 0 (0) 6 (6.3) 13 (13.7) 56 (58.9) 20 (21.1) 4
You are confident that this knowledge could be applied in clinical practice 1 (1.1) 10 (10.5) 22 (23.2) 49 (51.6) 13 (13.7) 4
The exercise was enjoyable 1 (1.1) 12 (12.6) 15 (15.8) 46 (48.4) 21 (22.1) 4
This is an effective way of learning 4 (4.2) 15 (15.8) 16 (16.8) 45 (47.4) 15 (15.8) 4