Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 9;33(4):903–911. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01814-y

Table 3.

Social and Cognitive Congruence questionnaire for Students and Tutors

Items Students Tutors
Mean SD Mean SD
Same knowledge base * 4.08 0.84 3.89 1.05
Similar language * 4.67 0.68 4.33 0.71
Preferring informal contact * 4.14 1.10 4.44 0.88
Student wasn’t afraid to tell tutor if they didn’t understand anything * 4.78 0.72 4.44 0.53
Being interested in students’ needs and problems ** 4.75 0.55 4.56 0.73
Helping students ** 4.89 0.40 4.78 0.44
Tutor was able to explain students the topics based ** 4.86 0.49 4.67 0.50
Taking time for questions ** 4.83 0.56 4.56 0.73
Supportiveness of student tutor ** 4.83 0.56 4.78 0.44
Showing empathy ** 4.83 0.45 4.89 0.33
Being interested in student as learner ** 4.72 0.61 4.78 0.44
Effectiveness of the student tutor ** 4.42 0.77 4.00 0.71
Being open and approachable ** 4.89 0.40 4.78 0.44
Helpful and constructive feedback ** 4.42 0.77 3.75 0.89
Seeing tutor as role model ** 3.89 0.85 3.67 0.87
Stress-free and relaxing learning atmosphere * 4.83 0.45 4.78 0.44
Being interested in students ** 3.89 1.01 4.33 0.50
Easy and informal communication * 4.81 0.47 4.67 0.50
Trustful learning base ** 4.69 0.62 4.56 0.53
Creating open and non-judgmental learning environment * 4.83 0.45 4.67 0.50
Successfully passed the course ** 3.86 1.29 / /
Effectiveness of tutorial ** 4.86 0.42 4.44 0.73

Annotation: * = Item of cognitive congruence, ** = Item of social congruence. Successfully passed the course could not be recoded to a student version