Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;28:267. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01219-y

Table 2.

Summary of extracted outcome data and pooled analysis

Study LM ORR (%) LM DCR (%) PFS (moths) OS (moths) 1-y OS rate
(%)
Median 95% CI Median 95% CI Median 95% CI Median 95% CI
Yang 2019 62 (23/37) 45–78 95 (35/37) 82–99 8.6 5.4–13.7 11.0 8.0–18.0 48.8
Lee 2020 NA NA NA NA NA NA 17.0 15.1–18.9 61.8
Ahn 2020 55 (12/22) 32–76 91 (20/22) NA 11.1 4.6-NR 18.8 6.3-NR 63.6
Park 2020 12.5 (5/40) NA 92.5 (37/40) NA 8.0 7.2-NR 13.3 9.1-NR 55.0
Nanjo 2017 NA) NA NA NA NA NA NR NA NA
Zheng 2020 38.2 (13/34) NA NA NA 15.6a 4.0–17.2a NA NA NA
7.0b 4.0–10.0b
Saboundji 2018 NA NA NA NA 17.3 2.7–20.8 18.0 4.4–23.8 65.0
Reungwetwattana 2018 80 (4/5) NA 100 (5/5) NA NA NA NA NA NA
Akazawa 2019 33.3 (2/6) NA 83.3 (5/6) NA 3.7 NA NR NA NA
Ahn 2019 25 (10/40) NA 90 (36/40) NA NA NA 13.2 NA NA
Andrew 2020 NA NA NA NA 5.8 1.7–9.0 NA NA NA
Meta-analysis 42 24–59 90 85–94 NA NA NA NA 59 (53–65)

CI: confidence interval; DCR: disease control rate; LM: leptomeningeal metastases; NA: not available; ORR: overall response rate; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression free survival

aT790M + patients

bT790M- patients