Table 3.

Results of crude and multivariable regression models: association of transgender women vs. cis-gender men who have sex with men in relation to outcomes of sexual practices, stigma, hazardous alcohol drinking, and depressive symptoms

Variablesa	Crude Prevalence Ratio (95% CI), p-value	Adjustedb Prevalence Ratio (95% CI), p-value
Any receptive intercourse, yes vs. no	1.52 (1.37 – 1.69), < 0.001	1.59 (1.32 – 1.92), < 0.001
Number of male sex partners
0–1	reference	reference
2	3.07 (2.04 – 4.60), < 0.001	3.08 (1.94 – 4.90), < 0.001
3	2.16 (0.98 – 4.77), 0.052	2.13 (0.82 – 5.54), 0.122
4 or more	3.62 (2.72 – 4.81), < 0.001	3.31 (2.52 – 4.35), < 0.001
Number of paying male sex partners
Zero	reference	reference
1–2	0.96 (0.58 – 1.59), 0.879	0.81 (0.53 – 1.24), 0.331
3 or more	1.90 (1.04 – 3.46), 0.037	1.58 (1.04 – 2.39), 0.031
Any paying female sex partner, yes vs. no	1.30 (0.76 – 2.24), 0.342	0.82 (0.41 – 1.63), 0.577
Any group sex, yes vs. no	1.41 (1.29 – 1.54), < 0.001	1.15 (1.04 – 1.27), 0.006
Depressive symptoms moderate to severe: PHQ-9 dichotomized at 10	1.49 (1.31 – 1.70), < 0.001	1.42 (1.25– 1.62), < 0.001
Hazardous/Harmful alcohol use: AUDIT score dichotomized at 8	1.19 (0.91 – 1.55), 0.196	1.10 (0.91 – 1.33), 0.301
Moderate/Substantial/Severe substance use: DAST score dichotomized at 3	0.86 (0.60 – 1.22), 0.387	0.84 (0.62 – 1.16), 0.292
Linear Regression: Continuous Outcomes	Crude Coefficient (95% CI), p-value	Adjusted Coefficient (95% CI), p-value
Stigma Score	2.04 (-0.59 – 4.66), 0.091	2.47 (-0.41 – 5.36), 0.072
Depressive symptoms	0.79 (0.04 – 1.54), 0.044	0.60 (0.01–1.19), 0.048
AUDIT score	1.05 (-1.28 – 3.38), 0.248	0.87 (-1.16 – 2.89), 0.267
DAST score	-0.17 (-0.92 – 0.58), 0.526	-0.18 (-0.66 – 0.30), 0.320

^aRecall periods for all sexual behaviors are “past 3 months”

^bAdjusted for: age, educational attainment, employment status, site