Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 5;17(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13065-023-01006-0

Table 4.

Comparison between the proposed and reported MLC methods for determination of drugs under study

Method Proposed method Reported method [14] Reported method [18] Reported method [19] Reported method [20]
Technique

MLC, C18,

HPLC–UV

Bonded b-CD column, HPLC–UV

HPLC–UV

Hyper ODS2, Column C18

HPTLC Micellar electrokinetic capillary electrophoretic
Organic modifier Totally free Tetraethylammonium acetate Mixture of 45 mL Acetonitrile and 55 mL of water Acetone‒ethanol‒ethyl acetate‒2% sodium dodecyl sulfate‒glacial acetic acid (3:2:4:1:0.5, V/V)

0.02 M monobasic sodium phosphate

Adjusted to pH 3.0 (with 40% phosphoric acid) and acetonitrile)

Analytes similarity

AMP, SLB

CFP, CFX

AMP, CFP, SLB CFX, SLB CFP, SLB AMP, SLB
Runtime 6 min 28.3 min 3.6 5 min 20 min
GAPI assessment graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figb_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figc_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figd_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Fige_HTML.gif
AGREE graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figf_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figg_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figh_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figi_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13065_2023_1006_Figj_HTML.gif