Table 4.
Risk of bias assessment for the studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Feng et al. | Tran et al. | Armstrong et al. | |
---|---|---|---|
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were confounding factors identified? | Yes | Yes | No |
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Yes | No | NA |
Were the participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? | Unclear | Unclear | Yes |
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? | NA | NA | NA |
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Overall assessment | Low | Low | Low |
NA: not applicable