Table 4.
Risk of bias assessment for the studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
| Feng et al. | Tran et al. | Armstrong et al. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were confounding factors identified? | Yes | Yes | No |
| Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Yes | No | NA |
| Were the participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? | Unclear | Unclear | Yes |
| Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? | NA | NA | NA |
| Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Overall assessment | Low | Low | Low |
NA: not applicable