Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2023 Feb 6;133(9):2066–2072. doi: 10.1002/lary.30601

Table 4.

Risk of bias assessment for the studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feng et al. Tran et al. Armstrong et al.
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Yes Yes Yes
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Yes Yes Yes
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes
Were confounding factors identified? Yes Yes No
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Yes No NA
Were the participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? Unclear Unclear Yes
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes
Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? Yes Yes Yes
Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? Yes Yes Yes
Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? NA NA NA
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes Yes Yes
Overall assessment Low Low Low

NA: not applicable