Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;130(5):827–840. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522003749

Table 2.

Select cross-sectional validity metrics for each device

Model Body fat (%) 95 % CI for constant error (%) Total error (%) Equiv. 90 % TOST (%) Standard error of the estimate rating*
Mean sd Min Max CE LL, UL LL, UL
Criterion (4C) 24·7 9·1 6·4 46·9
Omron HBF-306 21·2 8·0 8·5 40·6 –3·5 –4·4, −2·5 5·4 No –4·3, −2·7 Fairly good
RENPHO Scale 23·3 7·5 6·3 45·0 –1·4 –3·1, 0·2 7·2 No –2·8, 0·0 Poor
HAWANA Scale 27·6 6·0 8·4 41·0 2·9 1·2, 4·6 7·8 No 1·5, 4·3 Poor
Wyze Scale 28·3 6·6 8·9 46·1 3·6 2·2, 5·0 6·9 No 2·5, 4·8 Poor
INEVIFIT Scale 26·1 7·8 5·0 43·0 1·4 –0·2, 3·0 6·8 No 0·1, 2·7 Poor
Weight Watchers Scale 25·7 6·3 6·3 40·1 0·9 –0·8, 2·7 7·5 No –0·5, 2·4 Poor
Tanita UM-081 25·3 8·8 6·5 48·0 0·6 –0·8, 1·9 5·8 Yes –0·6, 1·7 Poor
Vitagoods Form Fit 23·7 7·3 6·9 45·6 –1·1 –2·6, 0·5 6·8 No –2·4, 0·3 Poor
Omron HBF-516 28·0 9·6 8·3 53·6 3·3 2·3, 4·4 5·6 No 2·4, 4·2 Fair
Seca 804 36·4 9·4 20·1 67·4 11·7 10·6, 12·8 12·6 No 10·8, 12·6 Fair
Withings Body Cardio 24·4 8·7 5·1 47·5 –0·4 –1·7, 1·0 5·8 Yes –1·5, 0·8 Poor
Tanita BC-554 Ironman 25·5 8·8 6·3 48·2 0·7 –0·6, 2·1 5·8 Yes –0·4, 1·9 Poor
Tanita BC-568 InnerScan 23·3 9·4 6·7 48·2 –1·4 –2·4, −0·4 4·4 No –2·2, −0·6 Fairly good
InBody H20N 24·6 9·8 5·0 50·5 –0·1 –0·9, 0·7 3·3 Yes –0·8, 0·6 Very good
Seca mBCA 515/514 24·5 9·2 5·6 47·5 –0·2 –1·0, 0·6 3·3 Yes –0·8, 0·4 Very good

CE, constant error; LL, lower limit; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; TOST, two one-sided t tests; UL, upper limit.

*

Based on the subjective ranking categories of Lohman and Milliken(26).