Table 2.
Effect of EO on the growth performance of Muscovy ducks (n = 6).
| Items | CON | EO100 | EO200 | EO300 |
P value |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EO | Linear | Quadratic | |||||
| 1–28 d of age | |||||||
| BW (g) | 1172.6 ± 45.1b | 1245.9 ± 49.4ab | 1264.1 ± 60.8a | 1259.3 ± 43. 9a | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.072 |
| ADG (g/d) | 48.92 ± 1.77b | 52.29 ± 2.09a | 53.27 ± 2.59a | 53.06 ± 1.74a | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.047 |
| ADFI (g/d) | 130.45 ± 8.60 | 128.01 ± 20.31 | 129.05 ± 19.79 | 127.15 ± 20.51 | 0.743 | 0.475 | 0.412 |
| FCR | 2.67 ± 0.21 | 2.36 ± 0.30 | 2.30 ± 0.23 | 2.35 ± 0.31 | 0.097 | 0.049 | 0.265 |
| 28–56 d of age | |||||||
| BW (g) | 3546.2 ± 72.3c | 3649.4 ± 87.6bc | 3779.2 ± 60.6a | 3727.0 ± 59.3ab | <0.000 | <0.000 | 0.014 |
| ADG (g/d) | 84.77 ± 1.69b | 85.84 ± 1.81b | 89.83 ± 0.82a | 88.13 ± 0.91a | <0.000 | <0.000 | 0.023 |
| ADFI (g/d) | 279.59 ± 28.92 | 279.03 ± 24.23 | 282.93 ± 27.34 | 284.07 ± 27.10 | 0.252 | 0.141 | 0.196 |
| FCR | 3.46 ± 0.35b | 3.16 ± 0.20ab | 3.03 ± 0.14a | 3.10 ± 0.30ab | 0.045 | 0.019 | 0.092 |
| 1–56 d of age | |||||||
| ADG (g/d) | 69.41 ± 1.30a | 71.46 ± 1.69ab | 74.16 ± 1.11c | 73.10 ± 1.07bc | <0.000 | <0.000 | 0.009 |
| ADFI (g/d) | 216.11 ± 19.58 | 214.82 ± 12.84 | 217.47 ± 10.40 | 217.25 ± 19.49 | 0.358 | 0.198 | 0.241 |
| FCR | 3.23 ± 0.31a | 2.92 ± 0.22ab | 2.81 ± 0.17b | 2.88 ± 0.30ab | 0.047 | 0.021 | 0.089 |
Values within a row with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05).