Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 7;21:531. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04322-0

Table 5.

Relationship between RC and GDM risk in different sensitivity analyses

Exposure Participants(n) Non-GDM GDM Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Model I RC (mg/dL) 492 22.51 ± 8.32 38.95 ± 22.48  + 5 mg/dL: 1.473 (1.200, 1.809)  < 0.001
Model II RC (mg/dL) 479 23.03 ± 8.34 37.31 ± 18.63  + 5 mg/dL: 1.511 (1.211, 1.885)  < 0.001

Model I was a sensitivity analysis after excluding those with pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. We adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy BMI, hepatic steatosis, AST, GGT, ALT, FPG, adiponectin, and insulin

Model II was a sensitivity analysis, including those with grade 0 hepatic steatosis. We adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy BMI, AST, GGT, ALT, FPG, adiponectin, and insulin