Table 3.
Item analysis of the scale
| Item | t-Value | p | Factor loading | Cronbach’s α if item deleted | Corrected item-total correlation coefficients |
Retained item |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.932 | <0.001 | 0.812 | 0.886 (↓) | 0.572** | √ |
| 2 | 6.887 | <0.001 | 0.666 | 0.890 (↓) | 0.423** | √ |
| 3 | 14.241 | <0.001 | 0.622 | 0.885 (↓) | 0.612** | √ |
| 4 | 12.844 | <0.001 | 0.851 | 0.885 (↓) | 0.602** | √ |
| 5 | 10.003 | <0.001 | 0.751 | 0.889 (↓) | 0.478** | √ |
| 6 | 12.804 | <0.001 | 0.839 | 0.885 (↓) | 0.592** | √ |
| 7 | 9.965 | <0.001 | 0.844 | 0.888 (↓) | 0.507** | √ |
| 8 | 9.300 | <0.001 | 0.872 | 0.888 (↓) | 0.478** | √ |
| 9 | 14.278 | <0.001 | 0.887 | 0.884 (↓) | 0.621** | √ |
| 10 | 7.751 | <0.001 | 0.824 | 0.890 (↓) | 0.425** | √ |
| 11 | 5.233 | <0.001 | 0.290 | 0.893 (↑) | 0.346** | × |
| 12 | 14.555 | <0.001 | 0.857 | 0.883 (↓) | 0.673** | √ |
| 13 | 10.504 | <0.001 | 0.848 | 0.887 (↓) | 0.545** | √ |
| 14 | 10.611 | <0.001 | 0.810 | 0.887 (↓) | 0.554** | √ |
| 15 | 15.817 | <0.001 | 0.819 | 0.883 (↓) | 0.660** | √ |
| 16 | 10.478 | <0.001 | 0.872 | 0.886 (↓) | 0.552** | √ |
| 17 | 15.130 | <0.001 | 0.826 | 0.884 (↓) | 0.656** | √ |
| 18 | 14.504 | <0.001 | 0.837 | 0.884 (↓) | 0.654** | √ |
| 19 | 15.433 | <0.001 | 0.836 | 0.883 (↓) | 0.691** | √ |
| 20 | 18.096 | <0.001 | 0.817 | 0.882 (↓) | 0.710** | √ |
| 21 | 10.659 | <0.001 | 0.655 | 0.889 (↓) | 0.464** | √ |
| 22 | 5.732 | <0.001 | 0.280 | 0.892 (↑) | 0.389** | × |
Note. “√” indicates that the item was selected; ** indicates significance p < 0.01; “↓” indicates that once the item is deleted, the
Cronbach’s α decreases