Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;85(8):4033–4040. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000967

Table 3.

GRADE scoring of the relationship between GGT and CAG/PCI-induced CIN

Quality assessment No. patients Effect
No. studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Increased serum GGT Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute Quality
4 Observational studies No serious risk of bias Very serious a No serious indirectness No serious imprecision Strong association b 268 1078 SMD: 0.64 (0.13–1.15 ) Very low
a

High unexplained heterogeneity was observed among the included studies.

b

The pooled odds ratio is higher than 2.

CAG, coronary angiography; CIN, contrast-induced nephropathy; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.