Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;2016(6):CD009873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009873.pub3

Campeau 2007.

Methods Study design: RCT
Country: Canada
Total: 100 randomised (massage group n = 52, no‐massage group n = 48)
Participants Population: people undergoing radiotherapy
Setting: Department of Radiation Oncology at Notre‐Dame Hospital (CHUM) in Montreal, Quebec
Mean age: 60 years (massage group), 58 years (control group)
Interventions Intervention: 10 massage sessions. All sessions took place before the radiation treatment over 10 consecutive days
Comparison: meeting with massage therapist every day before their radiation treatment to assess their anxiety
Country of training: not reported
Years in practice: not reported
Outcomes 2 validated tests used to assess participant's anxiety levels
  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

  • Spielberger State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAl)

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "patients were randomized between the massage therapy and control groups"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Used a random number table allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Performed the same outcome assessment in both groups; VAS, STAI
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No selective outcome reporting
Quote: "every day during the 10 consecutive days of treatment, a VAS score was obtained for all patients. The STAI questionnaire was completed before the massage session and radiation treatment by the patients in both groups at the first, fifth, and last session"
Size Unclear risk n = 100
Other bias Low risk No other significant bias found