Hernandez‐Reif 2004.
Methods | Study design: RCT Country: USA Total: 34 randomised (massage group n = 18, no‐massage group n = 16) |
|
Participants | Population: women diagnosed with Stage 1 or 2 breast cancer within the past 3 years who were at least 3 months post‐surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of these Setting: not described Mean age: 53 years |
|
Interventions | Intervention: 30‐minute massages 3 times per week for 5 weeks Comparison: standard medical care alone. At the 5‐week study period, the women in the control group were offered massage therapy Country of training: not described Years in practice: not described |
|
Outcomes | Outcome measures at before and after sessions (immediate/short‐term effects ‐ STAI, POMS) and on the first/last day of measurements (longer‐term effects ‐ SCL‐90‐R, LEQ, urinary biochemistry, immunological measures):
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomly assigned using a flip of a coin at times of screening" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "of the 34 women comprising the final sample, 27 women provided immune measure data" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 7 women did not have their blood drawn; reasons provided |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information provided |
Size | High risk | n = 34 |
Other bias | High risk | Imbalance found in the baseline measurement of anxiety (STAI) between the massage therapy and control group; however, no significant between‐group differences in participant demographic data |