Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 3;2016(6):CD009873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009873.pub3

Toth 2013.

Methods Study design: RCT
Country: USA
Total: 39 randomised (massage group n = 20, no touch n = 10, usual care n = 9)
Participants Population: people with metastatic cancer
Setting: home
Mean age: 54.9 years (massage group), 55.6 years (usual care)
Interventions Intervention: massage therapy (touch intervention)
Comparison no touch intervention with no therapeutic intention
or usual care
Country of training: not reported
Years in practice: minimum 3 years full‐time or 5 years part‐time practice
Outcomes Primary outcomes:
  • Pain‐Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

  • Anxiety‐VAS

  • Alertness‐VAS


Secondary outcome:
  • QoL

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Quote: "patients were randomized"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Assessed the same outcomes (Pain‐VAS, Anxiety‐VAS, Alertness‐VAS)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information provided
Size High risk n = 39
Other bias Low risk No other significant bias found