Table 1.
Phasic responses of prelimbic neurons separated into classes based on epoch (pre- vs. post-lever press) and direction of response (excitation (↑), inhibition (↓), not significant (-))
Self-Admin |
Significant: 110/259 (42.6%) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post |
| |||||||
↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | - | - | ↑ |
16 (6.2%) | 2 (0.8%) | 14 (5.4%) | 28 (10.8%) | ||||
↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | - | - | ↓ |
15 (5.8%) | 3 (1.2%) | 14 (5.4%) | 18 (7.0%) | ||||
Early Ext | Significant: 65/283 (23.0%) | ||||||
↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | - | - | ↑ |
15 (5.3%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (4.2%) | 13 (4.6%) | ||||
↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | - | - | ↓ |
7 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (3.2%) | 9 (3.2%) | ||||
Late Ext | Significant: 24/162 (14.9%) | ||||||
↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | - | - | ↑ |
7 (4.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.2%) | 2 (1.2%) | ||||
↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | - | - | ↓ |
2 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (3.7%) | 5 (3.1%) | ||||
Cue Reinst | Significant: 98/255 (38.5%) | ||||||
↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | - | - | ↑ |
17 (6.7%) | 2 (0.8%) | 14 (5.5%) | 24 (9.4%) | ||||
↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | - | - | ↓ |
15 (5.9%) | 1 (0.4%) | 12 (4.7%) | 13 (5.1%) | ||||
Coc Reinstat | Significant: 82/195 (42.2%) | ||||||
↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | - | - | ↑ |
14 (7.2%) | 2 (1.0%) | 15 (7.7%) | 10 (5.1%) | ||||
↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | - | - | ↓ |
11 (5.6%) | 1 (0.5%) | 16 (8.2%) | 13 (6.7%) |
For each stage of the study (self-administration, early and late extinction, and cue-induced and cocaine-induced reinstatement), neurons are separated into 8 categories based on whether or not they were significantly excited or inhibited in the 2-s epoch pre and/or post lever press