Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 8;102(9):795–802. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002206

Table 3.

Group average of hip sagittal range of motion (RoM), peak extension angles, and peak flexion angles for all testing conditions.

Joint angles BASELINE UTS LTS CTS P-values
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI) ANOVA Post-hoc comparison
Hip (strong)
Sagittal ROM (⁰) 41.5 (36.5, 46.5) 44.7 (38.2, 51.3) 41.8 (35.1, 48.6) 49.0 (44.9, 53.1) 0.008 0.001* (BASELINE/CTS)
0.021* (LTS/CTS)
Peak extension of stance (⁰) −8.6 (−12.3, −4.9) −8.6 (−13.9, −3.3) −9.2 (−15.6, −2.8) −12.3 (−15.6, −2.8) 0.231 NA
Peak flexion of swing (⁰) 31.6 (28.4, 35.5) 33.9 (30.4, 41) 30.1 (28.2, 32.3) 34.8 (31.1, 41.4) 0.01 0.05 (BASELINE/CTS)
0.043* (UTS/LTS)
0.013* (LTS/CTS)
Hip (weak)
Sagittal ROM (⁰) 39.3 (37.1, 41.6) 40.0 (34.8, 46) 40.1 (33.8, 46.5) 43.5 (37.8, 49.2) 0.338 NA
Peak extension of stance (⁰) −6.6 (−9.4, −3.8) −5.6 (−10.4, −0.9) −7.5 (−13.4, −1.6) −6.9 (−12.4, −1.5) 0.843 NA
Peak flexion of swing (⁰) 32.3 (30.2, 34) 34.0 (30.2, 38.6) 32.0 (28.4, 35.1) 36.7 (32, 40.3) 0.017 0.033* (BASELINE/CTS)
0.004* (LTS/CTS)

Note. Positive numbers represent flexion; negative numbers represent extension. The asterisk indicates a significant difference between two conditions. Abbreviations: UTS, Upper Trunk Support; LTS, Lower Trunk Support; CTS, Combined Trunk Support; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; RoM, Range of Motion.