Table 5.

Performance comparison with other lesion segmentation methods on the original ISIC 2017 test dataset

Methods	Year	Jac	Dsc	Acc
Al-Masni et al. [26]	2018	0.771	0.871	0.940
Tschandl et al. [27]	2019	0.768	0.851
Yuan and Lo [28]	2019	0.765	0.849	0.934
Navarro et al. [50]	2019	0.769	0.854	0.955
Xieet al. [29]	2020	0.783	0.862	0.938
Ozturk and Ozkaya [30]	2020	0.783	0.886	0.953
Shan et al. [51]	2020	0.763	0.846	0.937
Kaymak et al. [52]	2020	0.725	0.841	0.939
Nguyen et al. [40]	2020	0.781	0.861
Zafar et al. [36]	2020	0.772	0.858
Goyal et al. [53]	2020	0.793	0.871
Tong et al. [32]	2021	0.742		0.926
Chen et al. [54]	2022	0.8036	0.8704	0.9471
Ashraf et al. [55]	2022	0.8005
Our method		0.807	0.880	0.948

The bold values emphasize the highest values