Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 20;102(9):1236–1242. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14633

TABLE 3.

Kendall's tau‐b correlations for intra‐rater comparisons of LAD score and LAD category, by probe and rater assessment.

n (% of total study population) LAD score P‐value LAD category P‐value
Rater 1
Probe 1, assessment 1 vs 2 126 (89.4) 0.997 < 0.01 1.000 <0.01
Probe 2, assessment 1 vs 2 131 (92.9) 0.944 <0.01 0.996 <0.01
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 1 125 (88.7) 0.800 <0.01 0.840 <0.01
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 2 124 (87.9) 0.816 <0.01 0.837 <0.01
Rater 2
Probe 1, assessment 1 vs 2 122 (86.5) 0.860 <0.01 0.801 <0.01
Probe 2, assessment 1 vs 2 127 (90.1) 0.787 <0.01 0.863 <0.01
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 1 124 (87.9) 0.832 <0.01 0.831 <0.01
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 2 126 (89.4) 0.964 <0.01 0.848 <0.01