TABLE 3.
n (% of total study population) | LAD score | P‐value | LAD category | P‐value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rater 1 | |||||
Probe 1, assessment 1 vs 2 | 126 (89.4) | 0.997 | < 0.01 | 1.000 | <0.01 |
Probe 2, assessment 1 vs 2 | 131 (92.9) | 0.944 | <0.01 | 0.996 | <0.01 |
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 1 | 125 (88.7) | 0.800 | <0.01 | 0.840 | <0.01 |
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 2 | 124 (87.9) | 0.816 | <0.01 | 0.837 | <0.01 |
Rater 2 | |||||
Probe 1, assessment 1 vs 2 | 122 (86.5) | 0.860 | <0.01 | 0.801 | <0.01 |
Probe 2, assessment 1 vs 2 | 127 (90.1) | 0.787 | <0.01 | 0.863 | <0.01 |
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 1 | 124 (87.9) | 0.832 | <0.01 | 0.831 | <0.01 |
Probe 1 vs 2, assessment 2 | 126 (89.4) | 0.964 | <0.01 | 0.848 | <0.01 |