Table 2.
The distribution of lesion size and tooth localization in the study groups according to Yüksel et al. [22].
| Location of lesion | Score | Lesion (n) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Total | ||
| Enamel | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dentin <1/3 | 2 | 16 | 17 | 33 |
| Dentine 1/3-2/3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| Dentine >2/3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Enamel and dentin <1/3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Enamel and dentin 1/3-2/3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Enamel and dentin >2/3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dentine and root <1/3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dentine and root 1/3-2/3 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dentine and root >2/3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enamel, dentin and root <1/3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enamel, dentin and root 1/3-2/3 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enamel, dentin and root >2/3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Root | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enamel and root | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 28 | 55 | |