Table 1.
Total phenolic contents (TPC), antioxidant activity values (DPPH, ABTS) and sugar profiles of the sweet potato samples according to their flesh color and cooking methods (mean ± standard deviation).
White-fleshed sweet potato |
Orange-fleshed sweet potato |
Purple-fleshed sweet potato |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baking | Boiling | Sous vide | Baking | Boiling | Sous vide | Baking | Boiling | Sous vide | |
TPC (mg GAE/g fw) | 4.16 ± 0.24d | 1.68 ± 0.01e | 1.70 ± 0.12e | 6.19 ± 0.14c | 2.50 ± 0.08e | 4.56 ± 0.09d | 9.82 ± 0.07b | 10.78 ± 0.08a | 11.36 ± 0.04a |
DPPH (μM TE/g fw) | 17.42 ± 0.30f | 7.96 ± 0.70h | 8.62 ± 0.62h | 30.11 ± 0.64d | 14.96 ± 0.56g | 20.69 ± 0.20e | 42.31 ± 0.94c | 47.92 ± 1.14b | 50.26 ± 1.05a |
ABTS (μM TE/g fw) | 22.69 ± 0.55f | 10.50 ± 0.71h | 11.21 ± 0.63h | 37.71 ± 0.77d | 18.48 ± 0.51g | 26.43 ± 0.30e | 53.86 ± 0.93c | 60.56 ± 1.10b | 63.53 ± 1.06a |
Sugars | |||||||||
Maltose | 5.20 ± 0.02a | 5.16 ± 0.04b | 4.90 ± 0.16c | 4.78 ± 0.04e | 3.88 ± 0.03h | 3.80 ± 0.07i | 4.82 ± 0.03d | 4.74 ± 0.08f | 4.64 ± 0.04g |
Sucrose | 3.12 ± 0.01b | 3.10 ± 0.02c | 2.94 ± 0.09d | 3.35 ± 0.03a | 2.72 ± 0.02h | 2.66 ± 0.05i | 2.89 ± 0.02e | 2.84 ± 0.05f | 2.78 ± 0.03g |
Glucose | 1.13 ± 0.03b | 1.03 ± 0.01d | 1.11 ± 0.03c | 1.26 ± 0.02a | 0.92 ± 0.01e | 0.66 ± 0.01f | 0.40 ± 0.01i | 0.43 ± 0.06h | 0.45 ± 0.00g |
Fructose | 0.62 ± 0.00b | 0.51 ± 0.00d | 0.59 ± 0.02c | 0.69 ± 0.01a | 0.46 ± 0.01e | 0.37 ± 0.01f | 0.32 ± 0.01g | 0.31 ± 0.01g | 0.29 ± 0.01h |
Total | 10.1 ± 0.07a | 9.8 ± 0.08b | 9.6 ± 0.21c | 10.1 ± 0.09a | 8.0 ± 0.07g | 7.5 ± 0.10h | 8.4 ± 0.06d | 8.3 ± 0.08e | 8.2 ± 0.08f |
TPC: Total phenolic content; DPPH: Antioxidant activity based on DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl); ABTS: Antioxidant activity based on ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis [3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid]); fw: fresh weight. a-i Different letters in same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).