Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;9(3):e002817. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002817

Table 2.

Patients’ characteristics and additional value of testing RF isotypes

Study Nephelometry/latex test IgM IgA IgG Median age of patients (range or SD) Time from diagnosis Median age of controls (range or SD) Notes
Visser 199617 Yes No No No 60 (16–89) 6 months (median) 47 (12–92)
Saraux 200219 Yes Yes No No 49 (33–65) n.a. n.a Combination more predictive of RA: nephelometry+IgM RF (sensitivity+15%, specificity −7%).
Bas 200218 Yes Yes Yes 64 (22–87) n.a. 58 (4–191) IgM-RF+IgA-RF: increased LR for RA.
Bas 200330 No Yes 54 (22–77) n.a 42 (4–101) DC
60 (50–75) HC
CCP+IgA-RF: increased specificity for RA diagnosis (CCP specificity 90%, IgA-RF 90%, IgM-RF 82%; CCP+IgA RF 98%; CCP+IgA-RF+IgM RF 98%).
Rantapää-Dahlqvist 200320 No Yes No 54 (31–77) 3 years (median) 55 (30–69) IgA-RF predicts RA diagnosis.
Vallbracht 200447 No No No 62 (±15) n.a 56 (±18)
52 (±19)
50 (±20)
Greiner 200526 Yes n.a. 58.6 (19–84) n.a. n.a
Mikuls 200627 Yes Yes No 51 (±13) <2 years 45 (±14) HC
39 (±12) SLE
CCP sensitivity 62%, specificity 94%. IgM-RF sensitivity 70%, specificity 80%. IgA-RF sensitivity 65%, specificity 87%. IgG-RF sensitivity 38%, specificity 85%. CCP+IgM RF sensitivity 55%, specificity 98%. CCP+IgA RF sensitivity 59%, specificity 98%.
Bobbio Pallavicini 200716 Yes n.a. n.a. n.a. 57 (±12) 8.3 (±6.9) n.a.
Jaskowski 201022 Yes Yes No No n.a. 8.6 years (mean) 33 (16–70) In 48 CCP-negative subjects, 57% were FR positive (IgM-RF+IgA RF or triple positive).
Nell-Duxneuner 201014 Yes No No 50 (18–83) < 3 months 43 (18–87)
Brink 201621 Yes No No 50.3
(IQR 20.1)
6.2 years (median) 51.1
(IQR 20)
In pre-symptomatic individuals, OR IgM-RF 11.1, IgM-RF+IgA RF 21.9, IgM-RF+IgA-RF+IgG RF 34.5. OR CCP 20.2. OR CCP+IgA RF 50.7, CCP+IgG RF 30.2, CCP+IgM RF 67.6.
Sieghart 201823 Yes Yes Yes No 57 (47–66) EA
53 (44–63) RA
<3 months
>2 years
55 (43–64) DC
50 (42.55) HC
14/290 (4.8%) patients negative at nephelometry resulted positive for IgM-RF. 14/109 (12.8%) ACPA-IgM-RF negative were IgA-RF+.
Elshafie 201915 Yes Yes Yes 49 (18–80) 3 years
(1–420 months)
35 (n.a.) CCP sensitivity 70.7%. CCP+IgM RF sensitivity 80.1%. CCP+IgM-RF+IgA RF sensitivity 89.5%. CCP+IgM-RF+IgA-RF+IgG RF sensitivity 100%.
Kelmenson 202024 n.a. n.a. n.a. 37 (±8) 5.1 years 37 (±8)
Janssen 202028 n.a. n.a. 55 (±11) 5.5 years (3–10) 42 (±15) DC
34 (±15) HC
Hermosillo-Villafranca 202125 No No No n.a. n.a n.a.
Pertsinidou 202129 n.a. n.a. n.a. 57 M/54 F (18–70) <2 months n.a.
Van Hoovels 202231 Yes Yes No 57 (18–86) 16.8%<6 weeks
83.2%≥6 weeks
53 (11–92) IgA RF picked up 0.5% or 2.3% (Thermo Fisher or Orgentec assay, respectively) RA patients that were ACPA and IgM RF negative. Single IgA RF positivity was found in 1.5% or 5.6% (Thermo Fisher or Orgentec assay, respectively) of controls.
CCP+high titers RF (IgA or IgM) LR 62-infinity.

CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies; DC, disease controls; EA, early arthritis; HC, healthy controls; Ig, Immunoglobulin; LR, likelihood ratio; n.a., not applicable; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.