Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;7(8):101971. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.101971

TABLE 2.

Effect of vitamin D supplementation compared with no vitamin D on primary and secondary outcomes

Vitamin D No vitamin D HR or risk ratio1 (95% CI) P value
Primary outcome
 Fever, cough, or shortness of breath at baseline, n (%)
 No 20 (22.2) 27 (29.7)
 Yes 70 (77.8) 63 (69.2)
 Missing 0 (0.0) 1 (1.1)
 Days to resolution, median (95% CI) (N = 132) 3 (2-5) 3 (2-4) 0.92 (0.66, 1.30) 0.650
Secondary outcomes
 Fever at baseline, n (%)
 No 45 (50.0) 54 (59.3)
 Yes 45 (50.0) 37 (40.7)
 Days to resolution, median (95% CI) (N = 81) 2 (2–2) 2 (2–2) 1.02 (0.65, 1.59) 0.938
 Cough at baseline, n (%)
 No 36 (40.0) 35 (38.5)
 Yes 54 (60.0) 56 (61.5)
 Days to resolution, median (95% CI) (N = 109) 3 (2–6) 3 (2–4) 0.88 (0.60, 1.28) 0.498
 Shortness of breath at baseline, n (%)
 No 77 (85.6) 80 (87.9)
 Yes 13 (14.4) 10 (11.0)
 Missing 0 (0.0) 1 (1.1)
 Days to resolution, median (95% CI) (N = 23) 3 (2–5) 2 (1–2) 0.78 (0.33, 1.84) 0.570
 Days to discharge, median (95% CI) (N = 147) 6 (5–7) 5 (4–6) 0.82 (0.59, 1.14) 0.236
 Need for assisted ventilation1 (N = 148), n (%)
 No 70 (95.9) 71 (94.7)
 Yes 2 (2.7) 2 (2.7)
 Missing 1 (1.4) 2 (2.7) 1.00 (0.73, 1.38) 0.998

Estimates based on univariable Cox or Poisson regression models.

P for the test of proportional hazards assumption (global test) >0.05 for all outcomes for which Cox regression models were performed.

1

Risk ratio calculated for the need for assisted ventilation; HR calculated for all other outcomes.