Table 2.

Results from the social cognitive regression model in the Health Action Process Approach framework across all 3 groups.

			Ba (95% CI; SE)		βb		P value		Tolerance		VIFc
Parameters (web-based application group)d
	Intention T1e	0.300 (0.124 to 0.476; 0.088)		.351		.001f		0.794		1.260
	Δ Coping self-efficacy	0.143 (0.015 to 0.272; 0.064)		.259		.03g		0.627		1.594
	Δ Coping planning	0.135 (0.015 to 0.262; 0.064)		.270		.04g		0.522		1.915
	Communication at T1	0.369 (0.007 to 0.598; 0.115)		.350		.002h		0.714		1.401
	Perceived patient safety	−0.111 (0.140 to 0.025; 0.068)		−.153		.11		0.965		1.036
Parameters (live seminar group)i
	Intention at T1	0.018 (0.070 to 0.440; 0.088)		.018		.84		0.924		1.082
	Δ Coping self-efficacy	0.150 (0.004 to 0.207; 0.044)		.290		.001f		0.672		1.488
	Δ Coping planning	0.062 (−0.013 to 0.157; 0.038)		.142		.16		0.687		1.457
	Communication at T1	0.385 (0.236 to 0.715; 0.088)		.369		.001f		0.916		1.092
	Perceived patient safety	<0.001 (−0.250 to −0.002; 0.063)		<.001		>.99		0.881		1.135
Parameters (control group)j
	Intention at T1	0.255 (0.070 to 0.440; 0.093)		.221		.007h		0.924		1.082
	Δ Coping self-efficacy	0.106 (0.004 to 0.207; 0.051)		.196		.04g		0.672		1.488
	Δ Coping planning	0.072 (−0.013 to 0.157; 0.043)		.157		.10		0.687		1.457
	Communication at T1	0.426 (0.236 to 0.615; 0.096)		.362		.001f		0.916		1.092
	Perceived patient safety	−0.126 (−0.250 to 0.002; 0.063)		−.166		.047g		0.881		1.135

^aUnstandardized coefficient.

^bStandardized coefficient.

^cVIF: variance inflation factor.

^dn=77.

^eT1: first time point.

^fB is significant at the P=.001 level.

^gB is significant at the P=.05 level.

^hB is significant at the P=.01 level.

ⁱn=125.

^jn=119.