Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;88(15):11102–11110. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01059

Table 1. Computed Activation and Reaction Energies (in kcal/mol), Synchronicity (Sy), and NICS(3,+1) Values in the Corresponding TSs (in ppm) of the Considered Carbonyl-Ene Reactions.

catalyst ΔGa ΔEa ΔGRb ΔERb Sy NICS(3,+1)
none 44.1 31.3 –2.6 –14.7 0.87 –19.9
Cl2 43.8 28.7 –1.9 –16.1 0.72 –16.9
Br2 41.7 26.8 –2.9 –16.6 0.68 –15.9
BMe3 34.8 19.8 –4.1 –18.5 0.62 –13.5
BPh3 28.0 14.1 –6.0 –19.6 0.58 –11.2
SnCl4 27.4 13.8 –3.4 –17.8 0.61 –9.9
AlMe2Cl 25.8 11.6 –6.1 –19.8 0.59 –10.3
FeF3 26.4 11.6 –3.2 –18.3 0.60 –9.6
FeCl3 24.0 9.5 –3.8 –18.4 0.58 –8.2
FeBr3 21.8 7.6 –5.7 –20.0 0.58 –8.0
InCl3 24.7 10.4 –6.7 –20.2 0.61 –10.5
TiCl4 24.0 10.2 –3.8 –17.9 0.55 –6.5
BF3 22.4 9.2 –5.9 –18.8 0.58 –8.8
AlCl3 19.3 6.1 –5.7 –19.0 0.56 –7.8
a

Activation barriers computed as ΔE = E(TS) – E(1-butene) – E(aldehyde).

b

Reaction energies computed as ΔER = E((E)-hex-4-en-2-ol) – E(1-butene) – E(aldehyde). All data have been computed at the PCM(dichloromethane)-ωB97xD/def2-TZVPP//PCM(dichloromethane)-ωB97xD/def2-SVP level.