Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;23(3-b Suppl):10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3-b.s17. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3-b.s17

TABLE 5.

Sensitivity Analyses of Survival in Patients Receiving Pirfenidone and BSC Using Alternative Distributions

Sensitivity Analysis Mean Survival (95% CI), Years
Pirfenidone BSC Difference
Parametric Distributions for Pirfenidone and BSC
Log-logistic 11.24 (9.87-12.82) 7.72 (6.51-9.01) 3.52 (1.86-5.57)
Gompertz 8.35 (7.44-10.31) 6.39 (5.54-7.96) 1.95 (1.27-3.24)
Inverse-gamma 9.53 (7.98-12.37) 6.40 (5.44-7.58) 3.12 (1.56-6.05)
Exponential 11.95 (11.82-12.06) 6.61 (6.54-6.68) 5.34 (5.20-5.49)
Log-normal 12.74 (10.93-14.40) 8.76 (7.29-10.24) 3.98 (1.79-6.14)
Alternative Methods for Calculating BSC Survival
Applying NMA HRa to the pirfenidone survival distribution 8.72 (7.75-10.26) 5.42 (3.16-8.15) 3.29 (0.79-5.77)
Parametric approach; Weibull distributions calculated using only Inova registry data 8.72 (7.66-10.19) 5.88 (5.05-6.96) 2.83 (1.54-4.46)
Alternative Methods for Calculating Pirfenidone Survival
Conservative piecewise approach; pirfenidone has the same effect on survival as BSC after 5 years 7.79 (6.95-8.74) 6.24 (5.39-7.33) 1.54 (1.06-1.95)

aSee “Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treatment” on page S5 of this supplement.

BSC = best supportive care; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; NMA = network meta-analysis.