TABLE 6.
Study | Type of study | Total patients (n) | Total subclinical ABMR (n) or (%) | Type 1 or type 2 ABMR | Time of biopsy | Treatment of subclinical ABMR | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parajuli et al. [102] | Retrospective single center | 220 | 25 (all treated) | Type 1 and 2 | Detection of dnDSA | ≤3 months post-transplant: Pulse steroids, IVIG, PP | No significant difference in 5 years post-biopsy DCGS between treated subclinical ABMR and no rejection |
Protocol biopsies in case of pretranplant DSA | Significantly better 5 years post-biopsy DCGS in treated subclinical ABMR than clinical ABMR and than DSA- indication biopsies | ||||||
50% rise in MFI | ≥3 months post-transplant: Pulse steroids, IVIG, situationally RTX | (92% vs. 54%, proportion of DSA- indication biopsies with DCGS not provided) | |||||
Graft dysfunction | No significant difference in post-biopsy DCGS between type 1 or type 2 subclinical ABMR. | ||||||
Orandi et al. [175] | Retrospective single center | 2097 | 77 (41 treated) | Uncertain Mostly type 1 | Protocol biopsies at 1,3,6, 12 months post-transplant in HLA or ABOi incompatible transplants | PP + Situationally RTX or eculizumab | No significant difference in DCGS between treated subclinical ABMR and ABMR free matched controls. HR 1.73; 95% CI: 0.73–4.05; p = 0.21 |
Significantly worse DCGS in untreated subclinical ABMR vs. ABMR free matched controls. HR 3.34; 95% CI: 1.37–8.11; p = 0.008 | |||||||
Yamamoto et al. [79] | Retrospective single center | 43 | 18 (all treated) | Type 2 | At dnDSA detection | Plasmapheresis and RTX | Significant decrease of MFI in 6 out of 18 patients |
Within 10 patients with rebiopsy, 4 had improvement or no change in graft histology | |||||||
Bertrand et al. [77] | Retrospective Multicenter | 123 | 51 (19 treated) | Type 2 | At dnDSA detection | A combination of IVIG/PP/RTX | Significantly worse 8 years biopsy DCGS in subclinical ABMR patients vs. no rejection. (78% vs. 97%, p < 0.01) |
No significant difference in 8 years post-biopsy DCGS between treated and untreated subclinical ABMR | |||||||
Loupy et al. [57] | Retrospective single center + External validation | 1,001 | 142 (56 treated) | Type 1 and 2 | Protocol biopsy at 1 year post-transplant | IVIG, PP, RTX | Significantly worse 8 years graft survival probability in subclinical ABMR vs. no rejection (56% vs. 90%, p < 0.0001 |
Significantly faster decline of eGFR over 8 years in subclinical ABMR vs. no rejection (p not provided) | |||||||
No analysis in regards to treated vs. untreated subclinical ABMR |
ABMR, Antibody-mediated rejection; DCGS, Death-censored graft survival; DSA, Donor-specific antibody; dnDSA, de novo DSA; eGFR, Estimated glomerular filtration rate; IVIG, Intravenous immunoglobulins; MFI, Mean fluorescence intensity; PP, Plasmapheresis; RTX, Rituximab.