Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 20;53(1):137–141. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.12182/20220160506

表 1. The comparison of baseline clinical data of MCDA and DCDA groups.

MCDA双胎与DCDA双胎的基本临床资料对比

Baseline characteristic MCDA
group
(n=198)
DCDA
group
(n=208 )
P
 BMI: Body mass index; IVF-ET: In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer; PROM: Premature rupture of membranes; sIUGR: Selective intrauterine growth restriction; TTTS: Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome; TAPS: Twin anemia polycythemia sequence.
Age/case (%) 0.001
 ≥35 yr. 23 (11.6) 52 (25.0)
 <35 yr. 175 (88.4) 156 (75.0)
Educational level/case (%) 0.266
 Junior college degree and below 114 (57.6) 131 (63.0)
 Bachelor degree and above 84 (42.4) 77 (37.0)
BMI/(kg/m2) 21.2±2.9 22.0±3.0 0.006
Increased weight/kg 15.2±5.3 16.2±4.5 0.053
Scarred uterus/case (%) 20 (10.6) 7 (3.4) 0.004
IVF-ET/case (%) 177 (89.4) 148 (71.2) 0.000
PROM/case (%) 38 (19.2) 27 (13.0) 0.088
Placental abnormality/case (%) 0.785
 Placenta previa 4 (44.4) 9 (50.0)
 Lower placenta 5 (55.6) 9 (50.0)
Preeclampsia/case (%) 25 (13.3) 14 (6.7) 0.029
Twin comorbidities/case (%) 52 (26.3) 29 (13.9) 0.002
 Fetal growth discordance/case 26
 SIUGR/case 40
 TTTS/case 7
 TAPS/case
 Fetal malformation/case 2 2
 Stillbirth/case 3 1