TABLE 2.
Survey-weighted logistic regression predicting unhealthy weight control behaviors (UWCB); estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals among Texas school students
| Survey-weighted logistic regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR for UWCB | (95% CI) | P | |
| Ethnicity (compared to White) | |||
| Black or African American | 1.15 | (.54; 2.41) | .70 |
| Hispanic | .82 | (.56; 1.22) | .32 |
| Other race/ethnicity | .92 | (.47; 1.77) | .78 |
| Age | 1.18 | (1.03, 1.35) | .02 |
| Obese (yes) | 1.59 | (1.16, 2.19) | <.01 |
| Physical activity (<5 days for week) | 1.43 | (1.14, 1.79) | <.01 |
| Adults’ support (no) | 1.57 | (1.08, 2.26) | .02 |
| Dating violence (yes) | 2.19 | (.35, 13.72) | .37 |
| Cyberbullying (yes) | 1.19 | (.42, 3.35) | .72 |
| Bullying at school (yes) | 1.89 | (.75, 4.69) | .16 |
| Gender (female) | 3.43 | (2.07, 0.5.72) | <.001 |
| Sexual identity status (sexual minorities) | 4.23 | (1.82, 9.83) | <.01 |
| Gender × sexual minorities | .26 | (.11, 0.63) | <.01 |
| Interaction effects-dating violence | |||
| Gender × dating violence | .70 | (.13, 3.96) | .67 |
| Sexual minorities × dating violence | .99 | (.04, 23.66) | .99 |
| Gender × sexual minorities × dating violence | .68 | (.01, 31.70) | .83 |
| Interaction effects-cyberbullying | |||
| Gender × cyberbullying | 1.22 | (.38, 3.93) | .71 |
| Sexual minorities × cyberbullying | .51 | (.02, 10.96) | .65 |
| Gender × sexual minorities × cyberbullying | 3.69 | (.17, 77.29) | .38 |
| Interaction effects-bullying at school | |||
| Gender × bullying | .64 | (.21, 1.88) | .39 |
| Sexual minorities × bullying | 3.93 | (.78, 19.75) | .09 |
| Gender × sexual minorities × bullying | .17 | (.03, 0.75) | .02 |
Note. 95% CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; UWCB = unhealthy weight control behaviors.