Table B5.

MAPE comparisons of mass densities between the reference and DECT parametric mapping models for a pelvic site with three tissue surrogates using a TBDE pelvis scan.

M701		Soft Tissue	Spinal Cord	Bone
Empirical Model		2.5 ± 2.0	3.3 ± 2.7	3.3 ± 2.2
Conventional	ANN	2.6 ± 1.3	2.3 ± 1.5	7.2 ± 1.3
	FCNN	1.0 ± 0.9	1.2 ± 1.4	4.7 ± 0.8
	DFCNN	0.9 ± 0.9	1.0 ± 1.2	5.1 ± 1.0
	RN-v1	1.0 ± 1.2	1.1 ± 1.8	4.2 ± 0.7
	RN-v2	0.9 ± 0.9	1.1 ± 1.8	4.2 ± 0.6
	DRN-v2	1.7 ± 1.8	2.5 ± 2.5	3.9 ± 1.4
Physics-informed	ANN	1.2 ± 1.0	1.4 ± 1.1	5.6 ± 1.4
	FCNN	1.0 ± 0.9	0.9 ± 1.1	4.7 ± 0.8
	DFCNN	0.9 ± 0.9	1.1 ± 1.2	4.9 ± 0.8
	RN-v1	0.9 ± 0.8	0.9 ± 1.4	4.6 ± 0.8
	RN-v2	0.9 ± 0.9	1.2 ± 1.8	4.7 ± 1.0
	DRN-v2	0.9 ± 0.8	1.0 ± 1.6	4.9 ± 1.1
M702		Soft Tissue	Spinal Cord	Bone
Empirical Model		2.3 ± 1.9	2.1 ± 1.8	3.2 ± 2.0
Conventional	ANN	2.6 ± 1.2	1.6 ± 1.1	7.5 ± 1.2
	FCNN	0.9 ± 0.9	0.7 ± 0.8	4.9 ± 0.8
	DFCNN	0.8 ± 0.8	0.6 ± 0.8	5.3 ± 1.1
	RN-v1	1.0 ± 1.1	0.7 ± 1.1	4.2 ± 0.8
	RN-v2	0.9 ± 0.9	0.6 ± 0.9	4.2 ± 0.8
	DRN-v2	1.6 ± 1.8	1.2 ± 1.4	4.2 ± 1.3
Physics-informed	ANN	1.1 ± 0.9	1.0 ± 0.8	6.0 ± 1.3
	FCNN	0.9 ± 0.8	0.5 ± 0.7	4.9 ± 0.8
	DFCNN	0.9 ± 0.9	0.7 ± 0.8	5.0 ± 0.9
	RN-v1	0.9 ± 0.8	0.6 ± 0.7	4.6 ± 0.9
	RN-v2	0.8 ± 0.8	0.6 ± 0.8	4.7 ± 1.0
	DRN-v2	0.9 ± 0.8	0.6 ± 0.8	5.0 ± 1.2