Table 1.
Method | Service | Staff involved | Attendance | Details |
Case review or intake meeting | headspace Camperdown | All clinical staff, service manager, and research officer | Weekly | Meetings involved collaboratively reviewing client progress and triaging recent client intakes. The HITa was used to display client clinical information for team discussion. |
Peer review meeting | Mind Plasticity | All clinical staff, service manager, and research officer | Monthly | Meetings involved discussion and review of client or patient progress and discussion of research projects and other collaborations when relevant (including the implementation of the HIT). |
Weekly administration meeting | Mind Plasticity | Practice manager and research officer | Weekly | Meeting involved an update or discussion on the progress of the HIT implementation. This included any new developments within the service, issues or challenges, questions, or feedback from staff using the HIT. |
Email correspondence and other interactions | headspace Camperdown and Mind Plasticity | All service staff | When required | All service staff were provided with the research officer’s contact details and were encouraged to contact them with any questions or feedback regarding the implementation of the HIT. |
aHIT: health information technology.