Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;23:417. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02548-0

Table 2.

Clinical practice of VBT alone and EBRT (with or without VBT) among different risk groups from 2003 to 2017

Patients(N = 1,227)
2003–2007 (%) 2008–2012 (%) 2013–2017 (%) p
Low-risk (N = 340) VBT alone (N = 243) 36.1 a 61.7 a 85.8 a 0.000
EBRT with or without VBT (N = 97) 63.9 a 38.3 a 14.2 a
Intermediate -risk (N = 334) VBT alone (N = 184) 6.1 a 48.6 67.0 a 0.000
EBRT with or without VBT (N = 150) 93.9 a 51.4 33.0 a
High-intermediate-risk (N = 235) VBT alone (N = 139) 0.0 a 42.0 66.3 a 0.000
EBRT with or without VBT (N = 96) 100.0 a 58.0 33.7 a
High-risk (N = 318) VBT alone (N = 48) 0.0 13.0 17.4 0.013
EBRT with or without VBT (N = 270) 100.0 87.0 82.6

Abbreviation: EBRT External Beam Radiation, VBT Vaginal Brachytherapy

aadjusted residuals, only values greater than ± 3 were marked