Table 5.
Comparison of descriptive statistics of students’ and lecturers perceptions regarding the overall assessment of online learning versus face-to-face learning
| Students without patient contact |
Students with patient contact | Item description | Lecturers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | N | M (SD) | N | M (SD) | N | |
| 2.91 (0.99) | 92 | 2.62 (0.73) | 63 |
Online learning Follow-up effort/ Preparation effort |
2.25 (0.91) | 32 |
| 2.11 (0.81) | 92 | 2.54 (0.74) | 63 |
Face-to-face learning Follow-up effort/ Preparation effort |
2.59 (0.74) | 34 |
| 2.10 (0.71) | 92 | 2.38 (0.83) | 63 |
Online learning Knowledge transfer |
2.54 (0.82) | 35 |
| 2.51 (0.83) | 93 | 2.25 (0.78) | 64 |
Face-to-face learning Knowledge transfer |
2.00 (0.68) | 36 |
| 2.52 (1.02) | 92 | 2.58 (1.01) | 64 |
Online learning Opportunities to ask questions |
2.82 (0.87) | 34 |
| 2.22 (1.06) | 94 | 1.83 (0.87) | 64 |
Face-to-face learning Opportunities to ask questions |
1.59 (0.73) | 37 |
| 2.60 (0.89) | 88 | 2.76 (0.98) | 63 |
Online learning Number of tips from lecturer |
2.76 (0.96) | 34 |
| 2.52 (1.04) | 91 | 2.08 (0.88) | 61 |
Face-to-face learning Number of tips from lecturer |
1.86 (0.88) | 35 |
| 2.43 (0.95) | 92 | 2.55 (1.13) | 64 |
Online learning Fun factor |
2.88 (1.17) | 33 |
| 2.39 (1.03) | 93 | 2.16 (0.83) | 62 |
Face-to-face learning Fun factor |
1.74 (0.75) | 34 |
| 3.82 (1.02) | 93 | 3.65 (1.10) | 63 |
Online learning Stress during the course |
3.47 (0.83) | 34 |
| 2.43 (1.04) | 95 | 3.10 (0.98) | 61 |
Face-to-face learning Stress during the course |
3.19 (1.09) | 36 |
| 2.99 (1.01) | 86 | 3.11 (1.06) | 62 |
Online learning Threshold of interaction |
2.71 (1.06) | 34 |
| 3.17 (1.10) | 87 | 3.40 (1.06) | 62 |
Face-to-face learning Threshold of interaction |
3.53 (1.40) | 36 |
M = mean, SD = standard deviation, N = number of valid answers (total: N=).Type of answer: 1 = very high, 5 = very low