Table 1:
Alabama Rural Veterans |
Canada Nasreddine et al. 2005 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Task | Mean (SD) | Mean % Points Possible | Mean (SD) | Mean % Points Possible |
Trails (1 pt)* | - | - | 0.87 (0.34) | 87% |
Cube (1 pt) | - | - | 0.71 (0.46) | 71% |
Clock (3 pts) | - | - | 2.65 (0.65) | 88% |
Naming (3 pts) | 2.78 (0.50) | 93% | 2.66 (0.36) | 87% |
Memory (4 pts) | 2.39 (1.72) | 60% | 3.73 (1.27) | 93% |
Digit Span (2 pts) | 1.63 (0.57) | 82% | 1.82 (0.44) | 91% |
Letter A (1pt) | 0.91 (0.29) | 91% | 0.97 (0.18) | 97% |
Serial 7 (3 pts) | 2.26 (0.92) | 75% | 2.89 (0.41) | 96% |
Sentence rep (2 pts) | 1.59 (0.62) | 80% | 1.83 (0.37) | 92% |
Fluency F (1 pt) | 0.73 (0.45) | 73% | 0.87 (0.34) | 87% |
Abstraction (2 pts) | 1.74 (0.59) | 87% | 1.83 (0.43) | 92% |
Orientation (6 pts) | 5.87 (0.71) | 98% | 5.99 (0.11) | 99% |
Total (Educ. Adjusted) | 23.66 (4.20) | 78% | 27.27 (2.20) | 91% |
Note. Item-level scores were not available for the Visuospatial tasks in the Alabama Veteran Rural Health Initiative Study since data were entered in accordance with the fields represented on the Original Version 7.1 published by Nasreddine et al. 2005. Domains with discrepancies of more than 10 percent between groups are bolded and discussed as potentially meaningful.