The representative combinations of treatmenta.
| Face | Neck |
|---|---|
| Randomized controlled trial (n patients) | |
| HA filler + RF vs. HA filler (n = 10) | |
| BoNTx + HA filler vs. BoNTx (n = 20) | |
| BoNTx + HA filler vs. BoNTx + HA filler + cosmetic treatment (n = 20) | |
| BoNTx + HA filler vs. BoNTx vs. HA filler (n = 90) | |
| Non-randomized studies and case reports (n participants) | |
| HA filler + radiofrequency (n = 1) | BoNTx + HA filler + MFU-V (or CaHA) (n = 101) |
| BoNTx + HA filler + laser resurfacing (n = 1) | BoNTx + HA filler + IFU (intensity focused ultrasound) (n = 12) |
| BoNTx + CaHA + HA filler + PLLA (n = 2) | CaHA + MFU-V (micro-focused ultrasound) (n = 47) |
| BoNTx + CaHA + HA filler + MFU-V (micro-focused ultrasound) (n = 101) | BoNTx + CaHA + HA filler + MFU-V (micro-focused ultrasound) (n = 101) |
| BoNTx + HA filler (n = 60) | |
| Bimatoprost + BoNTx + HA filler (n = 116) | |
| Reviews | |
| BoNTx + HA filler + various EBDs (laser, IPL, MFUS, FMR) | Various techniques |
| BoNTx + HA filler + IPL (intense pulsed light) + lasers + radiofrequency | |
a
This table has been adapted from ref. 100 with permission from Melo, Copyright 2020.