Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 26;6:e42532. doi: 10.2196/42532

Table 2.

Summary of qualitative findings by theme and responder status.

Theme High responders (n=9) Low responders (n=10)
Intervention content
  • Perceived information as novel and personally relevant for improving their own surgical health.

  • Changed risk perceptions related to alcohol use and surgery.

  • Opportunity for longer discussions with a nonjudgmental health coach was important (health coaching only).

  • Information is novel and believable but perceived as only relevant to others who have a more serious “alcohol problem.”

  • The information about alcohol and surgical risk was not shared before past surgeries and therefore inconsistent.

Intervention modality
  • Participants reported intervention was an acceptable modality and length.

  • Phone modality limited personal connection, and length was too short to discuss a sensitive topic like alcohol use (brief advice only).

Other influential factors: study assessments
  • Completing study assessments, which included completing a daily calendar of alcohol use increased awareness and motivation to change.

  • Completing study assessments increased awareness of alcohol use and motivation but intervention did not (brief advice only).

Other influential factors: intervention language
  • No thematic findings.

  • The term intervention caused negative reactions and contributed to participants thinking their alcohol use was not heavy enough for study participation.

Other influential factors: surgery factors
  • Surgery preparation and recovery influenced choice to reduce or stop drinking for a period of time independent of the intervention content.

  • More intensive surgeries, longer healing time, and continued use of opioid-based pain medications linked to longer alcohol abstinence.

  • Less intensive surgery and shorter healing time linked to faster return to alcohol use.