Table 3.
ISWT | Univariate model | Multivariable model 1 | Multivariable model 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted R2 = 0.203, p<0.001 | Adjusted R2 = 0.338, p<0.001 | |||||
β | p | β | p | β | p | |
LVDD | −0.303 | 0.007* | −0.307 | 0.004* | −0.187 | 0.116 |
Age | −0.359 | 0.001* | −0.361 | 0.001* | −0.335 | 0.001* |
BMI | −0.254 | 0.025* | −0.226 | 0.051 | 0.023 | 0.850 |
WBLM% | 0.435 | <0.001* | 0.328 | 0.001* | ||
Diabetes | −0.369 | <0.001* | −0.290 | 0.004* | ||
Leg strength | Univariate model | Multivariable model 3 | Multivariable model 4 | |||
Adjusted R2 = 0.044, p = 0.039 | Adjusted R2 = 0.098, p = 0.004 | |||||
β | p | β | p | β | p | |
LVDD | −0.238 | 0.039* | −0.238 | 0.039* | −0.159 | 0.179 |
Age | −0.180 | 0.119 | −0.194 | 0.087 | −0.152 | 0.174 |
BMI | −0.108 | 0.355 | −0.047 | 0.694 | 0.240 | 0.135 |
WBLM% | 0.332 | 0.004* | 0.332 | 0.004* | ||
Diabetes | −0.008 | 0.944 | −0.084 | 0.469 |
The relationship between LVDD presence and ISWT and leg strength performance and potential confounders (age, BMI, WBLM, diabetes status) of these associations were tested in univariate regression analysis. Multivariable Models 1 and 3 tested multivariable prediction of LVDD, age and BMI on ISWT and leg strength, respectively. Multivariable Models 2 and 4 added WBLM and diabetes status into Models 1 and 3 ISWT incremental shuttle walk test, LVDD left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, BMI body mass index, WBLM whole body lean mass
Statistical significance between groups