Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;23:290. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02577-3

Table 2.

The imaging characteristics before and after treatment between the Tet group and the control group

Tet Control P-Value
Samll nodule [M(P25, 75)]
 Before administration 6.0(4.0, 8.0) 7.5(4.0, 10.0) 0.120
 After administration 6.0(4.0, 8.0) 7.5(4.0, 10.0) 0.046
P -Value 0.206 0.710
PMF size [M(P25, 75)]
 Before administration 1568.0(682.0, 2905.0) 2055.0(904.0, 2070.0) 0.790
 After administration 1526.0(758.0, 2528.0) 2306.0(1243.0, 3722.0) 0.001
P -Value 0.210 0.000
Emphysema [M(P25, 75)]
 Before administration 6.0 (6.0, 11.3) 8.0 (6.0, 18.0) 0.035
 After administration 6.0 (6.0, 11.8) 12.0 (6.0, 18.0) 0.022
P -Value 0.059 0.016
Rate of increase in PMF size [M(P25, 75)] -2.5(-26.3, 11.8) 21.9(5.81, 39.9) 0.001
Patients with stable PMF n(%) 40(70) 23(32.8)
Patients with progression PMF n(%) 17(30) 47(67.2) 0.000

Progression PMF was defined as an increase in size of ≥ 10% from baseline, and stable as an increase of <10% . PMF: progressive massive fibrosis