Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;23:181. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01995-5

Table 1.

Summary of simulation scenarios

Scenario Description Covariate distributions Treatment assignment model Correlations
- Base case

x1, x2, x3, x4, x5Bernoulli(0.5)

x6, x7, x8, x9, x10N(0,1)

Logitpit=α0,treat+αLx1i+αMx2i+αHx3i+αLx4it+αHx5it+αM(x4itx5it)+αLx6i+αMx7i+αLx7i2+αHx8i+αLx9it2+αM(x6ix9it2)+αHx10it

Autocorrelation:

x9, x10: AR(1) Pairwise correlation: ρ = 0

A Correct functional form Same as base case Logitpit=α0,treat+αLx1i+αMx2i+αHx3i+αLx4it+αHx5it+αLx6i+αMx7i+αHx8i+αLx9it+αHx10it Same as base case
B Weak pairwise correlation Same as base case Same as base case

x9, x10: AR(1)

All covariates: ρ = 0.2

C Strong pairwise correlation Same as base case Same as base case

x9, x10: AR(1)

All covariates: ρ = 0.7

D Different autocorrelation structure Same as base case Same as base case x9, x10: MA(1) ρ = 0
E Non-standard normal covariate distributions

x1, x2, x3, x4, x5Bernoulli(0.5)

x6, x7, x8N(0,1)

x9, x10N(2,1)

Same as base case Same as base case
F Non-normal covariate distributions

x1, x2, x3, x4, x5Bernoulli(0.5)

x6, x7, x8N(0,1)

x9Poisson(2)

x10Gamma(2,1)

Same as base case Same as base case

Description of all simulation scenarios ranging from Scenario A to Scenario F, exploring sensitivity of results to different functional forms of the propensity score, pairwise correlation across covariates, autocorrelation within covariates, and covariate distributions