Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 8;10(8):ENEURO.0204-23.2023. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0204-23.2023

Table 2.

Overlap between intersectional and transgenic SOM subsets

L2/3 L4 L5 L6 All layers
X98;Chrna2-Cre (N = 3) % of all GFP+ 12.1 (0.2) 4.5 (1.1) 37.7 (8.9) 45.7 (8.7) 100
% DL of all GFP+ 0.0 0.0 8.7 (4.8) 14.7 (5.8) 23.4 (4.9)
% DL in layer 0.0 0.0 23.2 32.1 23.4
X94;Pdyn-Cre (N = 2) % of all GFP+ 7.8 (0.7) 49.5 (3.6) 33.4 (3.4) 9.3 (0.9) 100
% DL of all GFP+ 5.1 (1.0) 40.0 (5.3) 19.4 (1.0) 0.8 (0.8) 65.4 (6.2)
% DL in layer 65.6 80.9 58.2 8.2 65.4

Counts are from the same genotypes illustrated in Figure 2. In each genotype, the top row is the distribution of GFP+ cells (i.e., X98 or X94) in each layer, as a percentage of all GFP+ cells counted in each brain, averaged by genotype. The SEM is indicated in parenthesis. Middle row, Double-labeled (DL; GFP+ and tdTomato+) cells in each layer, as a percentage of all GFP+ cells counted in each brain, averaged by genotype. Bottom row, The same numbers as percentage of all GFP+ cells in each layer. These data are plotted in Figure 2B.