Table 5.
Relationship between the TG/HDL-C ratio and incident GDM in different sensitivity analyses.
Exposure | Model I (OR,95%CI, P) | Model II (OR,95%CI, P) |
---|---|---|
TG/HDL-C ratio | 1.88 (1.26, 2.81) 0.0018 | 2.06 (1.34, 3.16) 0.0010 |
TG/HDL-C ratio (tertile) | ||
T1 | Ref. | Ref. |
T2 | 0.35 (0.03, 4.18) 0.4101 | 0.80 (0.11, 6.06) 0.8312 |
T3 | 2.32 (0.43, 12.45) 0.3265 | 4.92 (1.00, 24.23) 0.0504 |
P for trend | 0.1785 | 0.0150 |
Model I was sensitivity analysis after excluding those with pre-pregnancy BMI≥24kg/m2. We adjusted age, parity, hepatic steatosis, AST, GGT, ALT, TC, LDL-C, HOMA-IR, and adiponectin.
Model II was sensitivity analysis after including those with grade 0 hepatic steatosis. We adjusted age, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, AST, GGT, ALT, TC, LDL-C, HOMA-IR, and adiponectin.
OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence; Ref, reference; TG/HDL-C ratio, triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.