Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 5;41(8):2107–2118. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04503-y

Table 2.

Comparative studies concerning synchronous bilateral renal masses

Author (Years) Country Type of study Cases Type of surgery Approach Stages Control Type of surgery Stages Approach Follow-up Final conclusion
Novick 1989 [20] USA Prospective 28 5 bilateral PN 23 RN/PN Open In most cases two stages 28 metachronous Not reported Not reported Open 50 months 5-year patient survival rate is higher in SBRM than in metachronous RCC
Boorjian 2008 [21] USA Retrospective 147

6 bilateral RN

82 RN/PN

46 Bilateral PN

Open 153 metachronous

9 bilateral RN

97 RN/PN

5 bilateral PN

Not reported Open 73 months The CSS is better in SBRM than in metachronous RCC
Amano 2010 [22] Japan Retrospective 31

22 PN/RN,

8 Bilateral PN

1 bilateral RN

Open 1 RN/RN and 9 PN/RN with one stage, 13/PN/RN and 8 PN/PN with two stages 22

1 bilateral RN, 17 RN/PN

1 PN/RN,

1 bilateral PN,

2 RN/ surveillance

Not reported Open 58 months Prognosis of SBRM and unilateral RCC is similar. Metachronous bilateral RCC is associated with higher distant metastasis and mortality rate than SBRM
Berczi 2016 [23] Hungary Retrospective 36

17 RN/PN

14 PN/RN

3 bilateral PN

Open Two stages 24 metachronous RN + PN Not reported Open 57 months In SBRM PN/PN and PN/RN guaranteed similar oncological and functional outcomes than RN/RN. Tumor progression and cancer-specific mortality were higher in metachronous group
Qi 2017 [24] China Retrospective 88

40 bilateral PN

30 RN/PN

18 unilateral surgery

Open Two stages 60 metachronous Not reported Two stages 60 metachronous 76 months The prognosis in patients with metachronous and synchronous tumors is similar. The OS between patients with bilateral RCC is compatible with unilateral RCC
Kim 2021 [25] South Korea Retrospective 44 Unspecified bilateral PN and PN/RN Open, laparoscopic, or Robot-assisted Two stages 45 metachronous

Unspecified

RN/PN

Not reported Open, laparoscopic, or Robot-assisted 65 months No significant difference in eGFR decline in SBRM group compared to unilateral RCC. No perioperative outcomes between SBRM and metachronous lesions
Packiam 2020 [26] USA Retrospective 77 Bilateral PN 75 open and 2 minimally invasive One stage 30 Bilateral PN Two stages 24 Open, 1 minimally invasive, 5 open/minimally invasive 111 months No significant differences in oncological outcomes between the simultaneous and staged surgeries
Di Maida 2022 [27] Italy Retrospective 17

15 bilateral PN

1 PN/RN

1 RN/RN

11 bilateral robot-assisted,

6 bilateral open

One stage 24

22 bilateral PN

2 PN/RN

Two stages

15 bilateral robot-assisted

2 robotic/open

7 bilateral open

42 months There were no significant differences between simultaneous or staged bilateral surgeries for SBRM in terms of LRFS and CSS
Pahernik 2007 [28] Germany Retrospective 22 Bilateral PN Open Two stages 28 RN/PN Two stages Open 57 months Whenever feasible, bilateral PN is the strategy for SBRM, to guarantee an optimal preservation of renal function
Simmons 2010 [29] USA Retrospective 134 Bilateral PN Open or laparoscopic Two stages 86 RN + PN

60 PN/RN

26 RN/PN

Two stages Open or laparoscopic 66 months Double PN should be preferred to preserve the renal function. The 5- and 10-year OS and CSS in patients with SBRM are similar to those with unilateral RCC
Wang 2016 [30] China Retrospective 34 Bilateral PN Laparoscopic Two stages 24

10 PN/RN

12 RN/PN

Two stages Laparoscopic 43 months Two-stage bilateral PN guaranteed optimal preservation of renal function with satisfactory oncological outcomes. The OS and RFS in patients with SBRM is similar with those with unilateral RCC
Ching 2011 [31] USA Retrospective 92 Bilateral PN Open Two stages 22 Bilateral PN Two stages Laparoscopic 66 months OS of laparoscopic bilateral PN was higher than open approach, while similar results for CSS occurred. Laparoscopic approach was associated with a larger percent decrease in eGFR
Hillyer 2011 [32] USA Retrospective 9 Bilateral PN Robot-assisted Two stages 17 Bilateral PN Two stages Laparoscopic 8 months RPN guaranteed adequate oncological radicality, with shorter ischemia time and higher renal function preservation than laparoscopic approach

RN radical nephrectomy, PN partial nephrectomy, RCC renal cell cancer, SBRM synchronous bilateral renal masses, OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, LRFS local recurrence free survival