Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 1;15(14):6641–6657. doi: 10.18632/aging.204825

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of antifibrotic and senolytic drugs. (A) Scheme showing the experimental design to assess the effect of antifibrotic or senolytic drugs. Nude mice were randomized after 21 days post-injection of irradiated SEN-IMR90 cells or IMR90 cells as negative control, to either the two approved antifibrotics drugs (nintedanib or pirfenidone), a senolytic drug (navitoclax), or vehicle, for two weeks. (B) Hydroxyproline content in the right lung tissues of mice treated with navitoclax, nintedanib or pirfenidone, compared with control; n = 5 each group. Statistical significance was assessed by the one-way ANOVA with Tukey test: ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. (C) Senolytic activity of navitoclax (left panel), pirfenidone (middle panel) or nintedanib (right panel). Diagram showing the senolytic activity of these agents after exposure of senescent MEFs (SEN-MEFs) or non-senescent MEFs (NS-MEFs) to increasing concentration of navitoclax, pirfenidone, nintedanib or vehicle for 72 hours, as confirmed by relative expression of the mRNA coding for murine senescence markers (Cdkn2a/p16INK4a and Cdkn1a/p21Cip1/Waf1), measured relative to Actin-b levels in lung cell extracts of nintedanib or pirfenidone group compared to control (D); n = 5 each group, independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by the one-way ANOVA with Tukey test: **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. (E) Relative expression of the mRNA coding for Tgf-β (transforming growth factor-β) was measured relative to Actin-b levels in SEN-MEFs treated with pirfenidone or nintenadib, compared with control; n = 5 each group, independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by the one-way ANOVA with Tukey test: ***p < 0.001. For further explanations, see text.