Table 1.
Antimicrobial screening of compound 2 and 3 against E. coli and S. aureus
| Entry | Compound. # | Substituents |
Inhibitory screening |
Dose response screening |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | DABCO | E. coli @ 150 μg/mL | E. coli @ 300 μg/mL | S. aureus @ 100 μg/mL | S. aureus @ 200 μg/mL | S. aureus IC50 (μg/mL) | ||
| 1 | 2a | 4-BrPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | 20 |
| 2. | 2c | 4-t-BuPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 3. | 2g | 4-ClPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | 80 |
| 4. | 2h | 3-BrPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | 90 |
| 5. | 2i | 3-ClPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 6. | 2j | 3-FPh | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 7. | 2k | 3-CF3Ph | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 8. | 2o | 3-thienyl | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | 40 |
| 9. | 3a | – | 4-anisolyl | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 10. | 3b | – | 4-t-BuPh | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 11. | 3c | – | 4-FPh | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 12. | 3d | – | 3-anisolyl | – | – | +++ | +++ | 5 |
| 13. | 3e | – | 3-ClPh | – | – | +++ | +++ | 80 |
| 14. | 3f | – | 3-CF3Ph | – | – | +++ | +++ | 10 |
| 15. | 3g | – | 4-ClPh | – | – | +++ | +++ | 20 |
| 16. | 3i | – | 3-FPh | – | – | +++ | +++ | <200 |
| 17 | CPC | – | – | – | – | +++ | +++ | ∼20041 |
--- represents no inhibition effect of compounds on growth as O.D.600nm above 1 was observed.
+++ represents the inhibition effect of compounds on the growth of S. aureus cells.
Mention about the statistical analysis – IC50 for each compound against S. aureus was obtained by calculating the concentrations corresponding to percentage inhibition mean values.