Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;13(8):533–538. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac109

Table 3.

Odd ratios of flavored e-cigarette users’ responses to various flavor bans (survey respondents who maintained use of non-flavored or tobacco flavor e-cigarettes as the reference outcome) from multinomial logistic regressions, stratified for each of the three flavor groups

Ban scenario Quitting all tobacco use Switching to any alternative products
Used menthol and other flavors (n = 418) (11) E1 (ref) 1 1
E2 3.52 (2.22, 5.57) ** 5.49 (3.84, 8.13) **
EC1 1.45 (0.90, 2.34) 1.67 (1.12, 2.48) *
EC2 4.27 (2.71, 6.73) ** 5.87 (4.03, 8.55) **
Used flavors except menthol (n = 861) (1) E1 (ref) 1 1
E2 2.37 (1.74, 3.24) ** 3.52 (2.75, 4.50) **
EC1 1.86 (1.37, 2.52) ** 1.61 (1.24, 2.08) **
EC2 3.08 (2.27, 4.18) ** 3.38 (2.64, 4.33) **
Used menthol but not other flavors (n = 1068) E2 (ref) 1 1
EC2 1.07 (0.76, 1.51) 1.05 (0.87,1.28)

Boldface indicates statistical significance, with * for p < .05, and ** for p < .01.

Ban scenarios: E1 bans e-cigarettes with any flavors except menthol; E2 bans e-cigarettes with any flavors including menthol; EC1 bans e-cigarettes with any flavors except menthol, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars; and EC2 bans e-cigarettes with any flavors including menthol, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars.