Table 5.

Relationship between AIP and prediabetes in different sensitivity analyses

Exposure	Model I (HR,95%CI, P)	Model II (HR,95%CI, P)
AIP	1.51 (1.37, 1.66) < 0.0001	1.44 (1.32, 1.56) < 0.0001
AIP (Quintile)
Q1	ref	ref
Q2	1.15 (1.07, 1.23) < 0.0001	1.21 (1.13, 1.30) < 0.0001
Q3	1.23 (1.14, 1.32) < 0.0001	1.28 (1.20, 1.38) < 0.0001
Q4	1.32 (1.23, 1.43) < 0.0001	1.36 (1.27, 1.46) < 0.0001
P for trend	< 0.0001	< 0.0001

Model I was sensitivity analysis in participants with BMI < 25 kg/m². We adjusted gender, age, SBP, DBP, family history of diabetes, drinking status, smoking status, TC, LDL-C, AST, ALT, Scr, BUN and FPG

Model II was sensitivity analysis in participants aged < 60 years. We adjusted gender, SBP, DBP, family history of diabetes, drinking status, smoking status, BMI, TC, LDL-C, AST, ALT, Scr, BUN and FPG

HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence, Ref: reference; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma