Table 1. Estimated seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato among forestry workers by epidemiological characteristics, northern France, 2019–2020.
Characteristics | Participants n = 1,778a | Positive | Weighted seroprevalence | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | 95% CI | |||
Sex | |||||
Male | 1,715 | 254 | 16.3 | 14.6–18.1 | 0.006 |
Female | 63 | 2 | 3.7 | 1.0–12.5 | |
Age (years) | |||||
18–30 | 326 | 18 | 5.1 | 3.3–8.0 | < 0.001 |
31–40 | 377 | 32 | 8.9 | 6.3–12.3 | |
41–50 | 430 | 39 | 9.9 | 7.4–13.2 | |
51–60 | 520 | 126 | 26.6 | 22.9–30.6 | |
> 60 | 125 | 41 | 35.8 | 28.0–44.3 | |
Type of occupation (nine missing values) | |||||
Forest machine operator | 320 | 32 | 11.8 | 8.5–16.2 | < 0.001 |
Forest technician/ranger | 357 | 80 | 23.1 | 19.1–27.7 | |
Gardener/landscaper | 20 | 2 | 13.1 | 3.8–36.8 | |
Hunting technology/gamekeeper/ fishery guardian | 144 | 12 | 8.6 | 5.1–14.2 | |
Silviculturist | 289 | 42 | 17.0 | 12.9–22.0 | |
Woodcutter | 622 | 86 | 14.1 | 11.6–17.0 | |
Other | 17 | 1 | 3.2 | 0.5–17.3 | |
Geographical area of workb | |||||
Eastern | 673 | 148 | 21.3 | 18.5–24.3 | < 0.001 |
Central | 401 | 39 | 8.6 | 6.4–11.3 | |
Western | 396 | 21 | 5.5 | 3.7–8.0 | |
Auvergne | 164 | 27 | 15.3 | 10.9–21.0 | |
Limousin | 144 | 21 | 14.4 | 9.8–20.6 | |
Nationality (72 missing values) | |||||
French | 1,659 | 241 | 15.8 | 14.1–17.7 | 0.02 |
Other EU countries | 47 | 2 | 4.5 | 1.2–14.7 | |
Number of years in forestry sector | |||||
1–5 | 241 | 16 | 7.0 | 4.3–11.1 | < 0.001 |
6–10 | 242 | 13 | 5.0 | 3.0–8.3 | |
11–20 | 449 | 37 | 8.3 | 6.1–11.2 | |
21–30 | 406 | 68 | 18.2 | 14.6–22.3 | |
31–40 | 317 | 85 | 28.8 | 24.1–33.9 | |
> 40 | 123 | 37 | 35.0 | 27.1–43.7 | |
Average weekly time in forest (hours) (19 missing values) | |||||
< 10 | 160 | 13 | 7.3 | 4.4–12.0 | < 0.001 |
10–20 | 199 | 32 | 16.4 | 11.9–22.2 | |
> 20 | 1,400 | 207 | 16.4 | 14.5–18.4 | |
Tick bites (28 missing values) | |||||
No | 182 | 13 | 7.6 | 4.6–12.3 | 0.002 |
Yes | 1,568 | 236 | 16.2 | 14.4–18.1 | |
If Yes, time from the last tick bite (one missing value) | |||||
< 1 year | 1,072 | 186 | 18.5 | 16.3–21.0 | < 0.001 |
> 1 year | 495 | 50 | 10.8 | 8.4–13.9 | |
If Yes, number of tick bites during the last year (five missing values) | |||||
0 | 494 | 52 | 11,4 | 8.9–14.6 | < 0.001 |
1–12 | 809 | 127 | 16.9 | 14.4–19.7 | |
13–24 | 131 | 30 | 22.8 | 16.3–30.9 | |
> 24 | 129 | 32 | 26.9 | 19.9–35.4 | |
If bitten last year, have you seen a red rash around the bite? (nine missing values) | |||||
No | 963 | 161 | 18.1 | 15.7–20.9 | 0.5 |
Yes | 91 | 21 | 22.3 | 15.0–31.9 | |
Do not know | 9 | 3 | 28.1 | 8.7–61.6 | |
Exposed to tick bites (33 missing values) | |||||
No | 220 | 16 | 7.9 | 5.0–12.3 | < 0.001 |
Yes | 1,525 | 233 | 16.4 | 14.6–18.4 | |
Area of LB incidencec | |||||
Low | 266 | 13 | 4.4 | 2.5–7.6 | < 0.001 |
Medium | 608 | 65 | 10.7 | 8.6–13.3 | |
High | 904 | 178 | 19.9 | 17.5–22.5 |
CI: confidence interval; EU: European Union; LB: Lyme borreliosis.
a One blood sample could not be analysed.
b Eastern includes Alsace, Lorraine, Champagne-Ardenne, Bourgogne and Franche-Comté regions; central includes Nord-Pas-De-Calais, Picardie, Île-de-France, Haute-Normandie and Centre regions; western includes Basse-Normandie, Bretagne and Pays-de-la-Loire regions.
c Incidences estimated by the sentinel network in 2018: low < 50 cases per100,000 inhabitants, medium 50–100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, high > 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants.